CO129-030 - Bonham - 1849 [8-12] — Page 407

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

abolished on the 30th September

1847, because it was

no

T

longer

requisite as explained in my

Preveport Seeparah sgg of the 14th September 1877, as some

others have been

to the

a similar nature

Linke

with a view

the Expenses

resuation of

of the Colony. I certainly do not

see that my Farrant has

any

Cause

of complaint

whatever; but I think it

right to add that were

a vacancy

to offer suitable for Mc Parrant's qualifications and position in life, I should accord offer it to him, being of opinion

not of may

that he is not

a

desirable

person for employment in the

Public

Service.

In explanation of the

letter from Mr Gustell,

an

Attorney of the Colony, to my

and of my reply

401

thereto,

I have only to remark that the Prosecution intered against Mc Tarrant was commenced

by

the Acting Attorney

General upon his own responsibility,

and

withdrawn by

that

Officer 3 months before my arrival in the Colony. – Under

these circumstanced, I did not consider it necessary to re-open the question, in which conclusion Mr Sterling the Attorney General's

Coincided

as

well

as myself, entirely unconnected with the Proceedings instituted against Mr Ferrant they

KONČÍSLA

Edit History

2026-05-17 12:49:26 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
abolished on the 30th September 1847, because it was no T longer requisite as explained in my Preveport Seeparah sgg of the 14th September 1877, as some others have been to the a similar nature Linke with a view the Expenses resuation of of the Colony. I certainly do not see that my Farrant has any Cause of complaint whatever; but I think it right to add that were a vacancy to offer suitable for Mc Parrant's qualifications and position in life, I should accord offer it to him, being of opinion not of may that he is not a desirable person for employment in the Public Service. In explanation of the letter from Mr Gustell, an Attorney of the Colony, to my and of my reply 401 thereto, I have only to remark that the Prosecution intered against Mc Tarrant was commenced by the Acting Attorney General upon his own responsibility, and withdrawn by that Officer 3 months before my arrival in the Colony. Under these circumstanced, I did not consider it necessary to re-open the question, in which conclusion Mr Sterling the Attorney General's Coincided as well as myself, entirely unconnected with the Proceedings instituted against Mr Ferrant they KONČÍSLA
Baseline (Original)
abolisted on the 30th Septenter 1847, because it was no T longer requisite as explained in mus A Preveport Seeparah sgg of the 14th September 1877, as some others have been to the a similar nature Linke with a view the Expenses resuation of of the Colony. I mrtainly do not see that my Farriant has any Cante of complaint whatever; but I think it vacancy right to add that were to offer suitable fo Mc Parrant's qualifications and position in life, I shoul's accord offer it to him, being of opinion not of may that he is not Servise. a desirable person for employment in the Publie In explanation of the better from Mr Gustell, an Attorney of the Colony, to my and of my reply 401 thereto, I have only to remark that the Prosecution intered against Mc Tarrant was commences by the Arting Attorney General upon his own responsibility, withdrawn by and Wh that Officer 3 months before myy arrival in the Colony. Under these circumstanced, I did not consider it resepay to re-open the question, in which conclusion. Mr Sterling the Attomey Generals Coincided as as well Mr. Sterling it, at myself, entirely unconnectio with the Proceedings instituted against Mr Ferrant they KONČÍSLA
2026-05-17 12:49:26 · Baseline
View content

abolisted on the 30th Septenter

1847, because it was

no

T

longer

requisite as explained in mus

A

Preveport Seeparah sgg of the 14th September 1877, as some

others have been

to the

a similar nature

Linke

with a view

the Expenses

resuation of

of the Colony. I mrtainly do not

see that my Farriant has

any

Cante

of complaint

whatever; but I think it

vacancy

right to add that were

to offer suitable fo Mc Parrant's qualifications and position in life, I shoul's accord offer it to him, being of opinion

not of may

that he is not

Servise.

a

desirable

person for employment in the

Publie

In explanation of the

better from Mr Gustell,

an

Attorney of the Colony, to my

and of my reply

401

thereto,

I have only to remark that the Prosecution intered against Mc Tarrant was commences

by

the Arting Attorney

General upon his own responsibility,

withdrawn by

and

Wh

that

Officer 3 months before myy arrival in the Colony. – Under

these circumstanced, I did not consider it resepay to re-open the question, in which conclusion. Mr Sterling the Attomey Generals

Coincided

as

as well

Mr. Sterling it, at

myself, entirely unconnectio with the Proceedings instituted against Mr Ferrant they

KONČÍSLA

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.